Hirose: Connecting the future
Industrial Ethernet Book Issue 109 / 10
Request Further Info   Print this Page   Send to a Friend  

Five reasons IoT applications need fog computing

Industry experts have warned that cloud-computing models in today's IoT systems are ill-equipped to deal with the data generated by the billions of IoT devices slated to go online. Devices generate data in a multitude of formats and a variety of protocols, making their acquisition and real-time processing difficult.

CLOUD COMPUTING IN THE IoT is about centralized data processing. In contrast, fog computing focuses on moving computational power, storage capacity, device-control capability, and networking power closer to the devices. In this article, we'll look at the fog computing model and why it is required in the today′s IoT applications.

Fog computing is a term created by Cisco that is used to describe computing on devices in an intermediate layer called the fog layer between the cloud and the IoT edge devices. The fog layer consists of fog nodes, which are essentially industrial controllers, gateway computers, switches, and I/O devices that provide computing power, storage, and connectivity services. The fog computing model extends the cloud closer to the edge of your network where the devices reside, and facilitates edge intelligence.

The explosive growth of the IoT is built on the premise of the availability of unlimited computing power and resources, which only cloud services can provide. In spite of its power and reach, the cloud computing model is not suitable for applications that are time-critical and applications where internet connectivity is poor.

Fog computing works best in IoT-based systems with geographically dispersed end devices, where connectivity to cloud-based systems is irregular but low latency is a key requirement. IoT applications that periodically generate data in the order of terabytes, where sending data to the cloud and back is not feasible, are also good candidates for the fog computing model.

IoT applications that process large volumes of data at distributed on-site locations and require quick response times are better served by a hybrid model that consists of both cloud and fog resources. The promoters of the fog computing model acknowledge that the cloud computing is here to stay and some functions in the IoT are better served by the cloud computing model. However, there are some distinct benefits that the fog computing model can bring to your IoT applications.


Fog computing works best in IoT systems with geographically dispersed end devices, cloud connectivity is irregular and low latency is a key requirement.

Latency

Sending all of your device data to the cloud for processing and analytics can take anywhere between a quick few minutes to several days at a stretch. For example, if your IoT devices are generating one terabyte (TB) of data per day, it could take you a couple of days to transfer this data to the cloud, process it, and generate actionable items from the data. By this time, the window of opportunity to act on the conclusions drawn from the data may have passed.

Today′s business applications demand a response time in the order of seconds or milliseconds. Time-sensitive applications, such as Industrial IoT, need immediate processing of device data to be able to take timely corrective actions. The fog computing model can minimize latency and enable quick decision making when compared to the cloud computing model.

Security

Sending sensitive operational data from the edge to the cloud puts the data and your edge devices at risk. Multiple levels of security need to be put in place in an IoT system to ensure that the data is securely transferred to cloud storage systems. Processing data at the edge helps prevent data breaches and enables faster responses.

Data integrity

The cloud model has outsourced the storage and processing of data. Data integrity is a key concern in the IoT because sensitive data from various critical applications is stored on a public cloud. Cloud storage providers typically do not disclose the physical location of the storage. In addition, sending data from the device to a gateway and then to a cloud over the Internet puts the data at risk of corruption or unauthorized access.

Data transfer & bandwidth costs

Transferring large volumes of data from the edge of the network to a cloud server can be prohibitively expensive. For example a typical offshore oil platform can generate 1 to 2 TB of data per day. The most common way for offshore oil platforms to transfer data is via a satellite connection, where data speeds range from 64 Kbps to 2 Mbps.

With these data speeds, it would take more than 12 days to transfer one day′s worth of data from the oil platform to a central repository. The cost of transferring this data on a daily basis could lead to unsustainable communication costs in the long run.

Independent remote operation

The fog computing model enables remote locations to reduce downtime and operate independently when the central system is inaccessible. For example, if there is a network outage and connectivity to the cloud system is lost, field sites can use local computing power to process and analyze data. Processed data can then be sent to the cloud for long-term storage when the connection is restored.

The role of fog nodes

At the heart of the fog computing model are fog nodes. Fog nodes are geographically-dispersed resource-rich devices that can be deployed anywhere in a network. As the IoT evolves and proliferates into virtually every business domain, high-speed data processing, Big Data analytics, and shorter response times are becoming the norm.

Meeting these requirements through the current centralized cloud-based model is proving to be difficult, whereas the decentralized architecture of the fog computing model can bring computing resources and application services closer to the edge, thereby enabling faster response times. The fog nodes are bridging the gap between the OT and IT worlds.

Discussion on what the ideal profile of a fog node should be is ongoing, but the critical responsibilities of a fog node are:

  • Receive real-time data from IoT devices
  • Run IoT-enabled applications for real-time analytic
  • Can typically respond to requests in milliseconds
  • Provide temporary data storage until necessary data is transferred to cloud
  • Send periodic summaries of the data collected from the devices to the cloud
  • Deploy applications from cloud to devices distributed across multiple locations

A framework that is based on a smart gateway (computer or router) with industrial-strength reliability, running a combination of open Linux and Docker container, and embedded with vendor′s own proprietary application, is being touted as an ideal solution for fog computing. The Linux open platform enables easy porting of IoT applications to the IT infrastructure, while providing multi-vendor support and programmability. Some providers are proposing a layer of abstraction between the OS and the applications to facilitate easy deployment and management of applications on the fog node. Powered by these features, a fog node can intelligently process large volumes of data received from the sensors and field monitors and send only critical data or a summary of the data to the cloud.


Fog nodes are geographically-dispersed resource-rich devices that can be deployed anywhere in a network. These nodes are bridging the gap between the OT and the IT technology worlds.

Industrial Linux

Moxa Industrial Linux (MIL) is small footprint, high-performance, industrial-grade Linux distribution developed for creating embedded and IoT applications. To provide a reliable IoT platform to customers, MIL is designed for use in its next-generation IIoT gateways and ARM-based computers. The IoT platform supports a wide range of wireless modules including Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and 3G/LTE, for connecting various devices. The MIL provides a container-based virtual machine like middleware abstraction layer between the OS and the applications.

The flexible software middleware allows you to run multiple isolated systems on a single control host so that you can easily change the behavior of the fog node without worrying about software compatibility. Armed with MIL, next-generation IIoT gateways offer an efficient, flexible, and robust platform for diverse fog computing environments and scenarios.

Ryan Teng, Product Manager,Moxa.


Source: Industrial Ethernet Book Issue 109 / 10
Request Further Info    Print this Page    Send to a Friend  

Back

Sponsors:
Analog Devices: Time Sensitive Networking
DINSpace fiber optic and Cat 6 patch panels
ICP DAS at SecuTech Thailand
Japan IT Week Autumn

Get Social with us:



© 2010-2018 Published by IEB Media GbR · Last Update: 15.12.2018 · 41 User online · Privacy Policy · Contact Us